Saturday 7 July 2007

The Terrorist, The Chicken, The Sky and James Bond.




An intriguing title yes? So what does it mean? In the days before the "Bombing Bush" & "Blair the Liar", terrorists were pretty serious in their attacks, had focused targets and were really quite scary. In the helter-skelter pace of today, people don't have much spare time to waste, the same is so, so it would seem, for terrorists. I mean, terrorists used to blow up buildings, try to assassinate high ranking government officials, collect rogue nuclear weapons etc. Now though the best that terrorists can come up with is a Jeep Cherokee with a botched fuel line and poor steering driven into the wall of a decent size, though hardly major, airport and leaving some broken glass. I have heard of downsizing operations and funding cut-backs but seriously, to call this a terrorist attack, bring in an extra 6,000 Police armed with what look like military assault rifles as seen in Iraq is totally ridiculous. Even the neurotic "Chicken Little" who rushed around panicking un-necessarily about the sky falling would probably not even raise an eyebrow over this...if chickens have eyebrows. As for James Bond, well in the good ole days when Bond was Bond, he fought terrorists who were reminiscent of Bush and Blair...deluded ego-maniacs bent on world domination at the very least(though even they had a touch of flair). These days Bond is not Bond, he has been lowered to fighting drug dealers and what is essentially little more than street crime once tackled by your friendly typical Bobby.

While I agree that there is a substantial terrorist risk facing Britain at the moment I must, and you should, question it's origins, motives and vehicle. We are "mostly" intelligent people with the ability to think, reason and analyse what goes on around us and react accordingly. The problem facing a democratic Britain is that the public are not exercising their "intelligence" quite to the degree that they should be.

I draw your attention to a comment I made recently in the Bournemouth Echo. It is as follows;

"
04 July 2007 11:43
What we need to be vigilant about when it comes to modern day terrorism is the fact that it is both implemented and actioned by left-wing extremist governments. Left-wing politics has experienced a shift so far to the left now that what was once right-wing is now merely where the left-wing extremists of today were in days gone by…or to simplify that statement, Anglo/American/Israeli governments have shifted to the left beyond reason.

When I saw the images in "The Scotsman" yesterday of Police, armed to the hilt with assault rifles among the general public it terrified me. All you need is for one nutter copper to panic and start firing rounds into the crowds and you have a major disaster. The images I saw in other articles around the globe yesterday were reminiscent of those submitted by former and fallen comrades in Iraq and Afghanistan. I look around the UK and no longer see a democracy, I see a country under occupation, not unlike Nazi Germany in WWII or what is about to very possibly likely to shortly become another Iraq, but without the oil.

The US government, the British government, MI5, as well as the police all claim and admit to having prior knowledge of last weeks Glasgow incident for two weeks…that is fourteen days! Now they must have been able to easily track from their informer the identities, locations and the likes of the potential culprits and their factions as well as the time scheduled for the attack with at least a couple of hours slack either side. The Police set-up road blocks etc after the incident. If this incident was deemed as potential and was beyond MI5's skills even though they had all the pieces then perhaps they should have "passed the parcel" up to MI6.

The Police are about to embark on a Nationwide program of having communities watch each other for suspicious activities and if the paranoid neighbours see anything odd in their neighbours and friends behaviour they should report it to the police. This is not helpful, it is merely divisive of communities who have functioned well for centuries and others who have already been driven to breaking point by this Labour government under Blair.

Whether you want to dismiss this comment as a delusional conspiracy theory or accept it as the truth you must admit my points are valid. The government, by bringing more weapons into a society allegedly under attack all of a sudden will only counter an emotionally stable public and drive the level of fear and paranoia higher. Democracy is based on the concept of the people electing a government to represent their interests and refrain from interference with the publics basic freedoms. Not only has the Blair/Bush government slashed public freedoms to less than that of those in our prisons, but it has also interfered with democratically elected foreign governments and crippling them until the government sought by Blair/Bush has been installed, but most of us already are aware of this. The UK and the US are in the grips of a dictatorship more powerful than anything previously seen anywhere in history."


Your democratically government(or they claim they are), are there to be questioned by the people who voted them in to represent them. Question them, dig deeper and if they refuse to answer reasonable questions without a valid reason then you either accept that they dictate to you, or have them replaced for failing to do their duty. Remember, they work for you.

To finish up, here is a picture from "The Scotsman". But don't forget the Police roadblocks, doctors being interrogated and tourists forced to queue for hours outside airports, line taps, surveillance cameras, stop-n-search, censorship of the press and media, detention without charge, the right to protest in certain area's only and then only if permission has been granted...If this is a democracy, thank the gods we don't live in an evil dictatorship where there are few civil liberties.

Thursday 5 July 2007

The Impartial Dorset Press




I have often found that our local press, The Echo in bournemouth/Poole/Christchurch etc is not keen on seeing people agreeing with the British National Party. Indeed our local press are so impartial and unbiased that during the run-up to the 2007 elections the local Echo ran positive stories on the Tories and Lib-Dem's and published an anti-BNP advertisement that was sponsored and paid for by the Labour party under the guise of a separate group, Unison, due to the fact that the Labour Party are so underhanded and unpopular that this would have backfired had the people been aware of the source. Here is the advertisement on the left and here is the link,
http://www.unison.org.uk/labourlink/index.asp.





Labour continued it's desperate attempt to deceive voters by distributing the following leaflet unashamedly with Labour Party literature.
















Here is the link to the UAF, a Labour funded organisation dedicated to destroying the BNP.
http://www.uaf.org.uk/

And here is a Labour Party admission by Angela Smith, Labour minister and Basildon and East Thurrock MP
http://www.basildonrecorder.co.uk/mostpopular.var.1332602.mostviewed.team_up_to_beat_bnp.php

Why are these people so afraid of the BNP that they must broadcast messages of hatred aimed at the BNP and cling to outdated reports of a BNP of 20 years ago rather than the BNP of today?

Now comes a very good reason as to why the local BNP is unable to get much in the way of press coverage and received negligible coverage during the elections in Dorset with the Echo whose editor is Neal Butterworth. Look at the names of the speakers on this page about Local Government. Pay special attention to the first three names and the seventh name. They are none other than the following;

  • The Rt. Hon John Prescott MP, Deputy Prime Minister
  • The Rt. Hon Iain Duncan Smith MP, Leader of the Conservative Party
  • The Rt. Hon Charles Kennedy MP, Leader of the Liberal Democrat Party

...and finally, a representative from the impartial and non-political press...a man with no particular political allegiences...Dorset's very own;

  • Neal Butterworth, Editor, Bournemouth Daily Echo.


http://www.lga.gov.uk/Documents/Circular/circular.pdf

Oddly enough the topic on which Neal Butterworth was speaking was;
1.40pm – 2.30pm Perceptions and Realities - does the media give local authorities a fair press?
Andrew Rawnsley, political columnist and broadcaster
Neal Butterworth, Editor, Bournemouth Daily Echo
Councillor Paul Bettison, Leader Bracknell Forest Borough Council



You can see this at the following link;
http://www.lga.gov.uk/Briefing.asp?lsection=758&id=SX3205-A780F482&ccat=589



Neal also appears in the following publication from Bournemouth Council promoting "
RESIDENTS SPEAK OUT IN GREAT DEBATE" at the following link;
http://www.bournemouth.gov.uk/Library/PDF/Council/BJ%20Oct%20Master%20v4.pdf
Yet he is selective in what residents say in his paper and is not keep on readers showing any support to the BNP as already stated.

Anyway, I cannot claim to know Neal personally, and for all I know he may be a decent, although rather misguided and hypocritical human being. The point of this article has not been to bash Neal...the point is to demonstrate the links between the government and the press that ensure the British National Party does not enjoy the freedom of the press.

If you would like to learn more about the British National Party or join up then please view the BNP website at

http://www.bnp.org.uk/

or telephone the BNP on 0870 7576267

Welcome All

Welcome to "The British Resistance". This is a political blog and if you are offended by any of the contents you are welcome to complain or simply leave this blog.

You should attempt to back up any allegations with facts and sources. If a Tory did such and such then please post a link to your source...the same applies for Lib-Dem's, Labour, Greens, Independents and even BNP. If you cannot substantiate claims then your post will be removed after 24 hours, however out of respect for the opinions of other contributors as long as the rules are adhered to the rest of the thread will remain.